It’s a bit early to start with the ’18 elections, but Newsday reports, “A potential challenger for Lee Zeldin emerges“:
Thiele’s record on gun issues is to support the antigun position about 95% of the time.
The good thing about him running against Zeldin is that Thiele would have to give up his Assembly seat to do it, opening up the possibility of getting someone better in his place.
On Monday, March 20, the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City will host a panel discussion on the role social media plays in gun violence with New York University’s Dr. Shabnam Javdani and others, John Jay College, Moot Court Room, 524 W. 59th St., Manhattan.
“Gays Against Guns … has launched its first major advertising campaign—an effort that will combine with protests around New York City against National Rifle Association-endorsed legislation in Washington that would mandate “reciprocity” in concealed weapon permits nationwide … The print, virtual and video campaigns consist of a series of 20 visually-oriented ads portraying a GAG activist and a veiled figure representing a gun violence victim. The activists in the ads hold placards declaring “Not In My______”—a message GAG hopes those concerned will customize during the 10 protests scheduled across the five boroughs …”
Here’s their ad:
This campaign is doomed to failure for one simple reason: GAG is running it in an area represented by officials who are already opposed to the bill. They are not changing any votes.
“… In September, the group—along with Public Advocate Letitia James and the National Action Network’s Kirsten John Foy—rallied against Smith & Wesson, a member of the NRA’s Golden Ring of Freedom. The Second Amendment organization bestows that honor on companies that have given it at least $1 million …”
This accomplished nothing.
“… The group also recently sponsored and participated in a solidarity rally in front of the Stonewall National Monument against President Donald Trump’s executive orders impacting Muslims, undocumented immigrants and his selection of anti-LGBT nominees …”
This has absolutely nothing to do with guns.
“Manhattan Councilman Dan Garodnick is talking with former political leaders, Democratic consultants, and donors about whether they would back his candidacy for mayor, political sources said … Sources close to the pol, whose term ends next January, said he is “50-50” about challenging the mayor in September’s primary …”
Garodnick has sponsored the following bills and resolutions during his time on the City Council:
- Int 0240-2006 – Penalties associated with the sale of toy guns.
- Int 0362-2006 – A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New York, in relation to a gun offender registry.
- Int 0365-2006 – Banning firearms, rifles, or shotguns that are colored so as to appear to be toy guns.
- Res 0821-2011 – Close the background check loophole at gun shows by establishing a background check procedure for all firearms sold at gun shows. (H.R.591/S.35)
- Res 1171-2011 – Supporting S.1973, the Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2012.
This records makes him slightly better than Tony Avella. So the new order of preference for candidates in a Democrat primary is:
- Anyone not Bill de Blasio.
- Anyone not Tony Avella.
- Anyone not Dan Garodnick.
According to the bill, the function of the office director would be:
- advise and assist the mayor in planning, developing and coordinating efforts to reduce gun violence;
- engage with members of the community, elected officials, and other interested groups and individuals to develop further strategies to reduce gun violence;
- review the budget requests of all agencies for programs related to gun violence, recommend budget priorities among such programs, and assist the mayor in prioritizing such requests
The real function of the office director would be:
- to allow the Mayor to put one or more of his otherwise unemployable cronies on the City payroll;
- acting as a defacto lobbyist for gun control organizations;
- reviewing the budget requests of all agencies and recommending budget priorities which funnel monies to politically connected associates of both the Mayor and City Councilmembers;
- self-aggrandizement and positioning the director to run for elected office and repeat the cycle all over again
The bill current sits in the Governmental Operations Committee.
From the Post, “Cuomo takes key step toward launching presidential campaign“:
“Gov. Cuomo has hired two Florida fundraisers, a sign he’s building a national network to launch a presidential bid, sources told The Post … The governor has been expanding his national profile since the Democrats’ dreadful showing in November …”
Oh my God, where to even begin with this?
How on earth can Cuomo build a national network of support when I cannot think of a single elected Democrat who has come out in public and said they like him let alone encouraged him to run for president? I cannot even think of one who said he should run for a third term as governor in ’18.
Expanding his profile will only expand the number of people who despise him.
“… “When Hillary Clinton was running he never wanted to have anyone speculate he’s running, but now the strategy is pretty different,” said Karen Hinton, a former Cuomo aide. “He is positioning himself to be seen as a liberal who can speak to a national audience.” …”
Speaking is not the problem. What comes out of his mouth is the problem. If Cuomo actually tries running expect non-stop ads based upon this statement:
“… You’re seeing that play out in New York. … The Republican Party candidates are running against the SAFE Act — it was voted for by moderate Republicans who run the Senate! Their problem is not me and the Democrats; their problem is themselves. Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are …”
Follow-up to last week’s post about the Republican’s making partial SAFE Act repeal a partisan issue.
“… During its monthly meeting last week, the legislature approved two resolutions supporting the Second Amendment, advocating for repeal of the SAFE Act and cancellation of the required recertification by pistol owners by votes along party lines. The resolution requesting an appeal of the SAFE Act was approved after a 10-5 vote. The decision was split between Republicans and Democrats on the Legislature with all Republicans present during the meeting voting in favor of the resolution and all Democrats present voted in opposition …”
“… The Onondaga County Legislature voted Tuesday to support a State Senate bill that would limit application of the Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act to the five counties of New York City … The county legislature’s resolution passed 13 to four, with support from all the body’s Republicans and opposition from the Democrats …”
“… Voted 7-4 in favor of a resolution, sponsored by Legislator Edward Rath III, R-Amherst, in support of state legislation to eliminate some gun control provisions in the state’s SAFE Act. The legislation would apply to areas outside of New York City …”
It is nice having these legislative bodies on record (again) opposing SAFE, but going about it this way is unhelpful.
Remington has laid-off 122 people at the Ilion plant.
Criminals violate numerous local, state and federal laws by bringing firearms into the City.
“Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today announced that he has obtained seven settlements with online third-party sellers from across the country who used Amazon to sell prohibited toy guns to New Yorkers … “We have seen all too often the tragic consequences that can arise when toy guns are mistaken for real ones,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “The toy gun law exists to protect New York’s children and our brave law enforcement officers, and we will continue our commitment to enforcing this law and holding accountable any retailers who violate it.” …”
The only good thing about Schneiderman wasting his time on stupidity like this is that he could be spending his time doing a whole lot worse.