Nov 16, 2018 Gun Industry, Politics
There have been some attempts, most recently with Ruger, to impose backdoor gun control regulations through company shareholders of both firearms manufacturers and sporting good retailers like Walmart.
That tactic is getting traction with antigun politicians:
“As part of an effort to address gun safety issues and reduce investment risk, a coalition of institutional and private investors with combined assets of more than $4.83 trillion has created a framework for engaging with companies that manufacture, distribute, sell, or regulate products within the civilian firearms industry …”
What sort of investors?
“… Signatories include CalSTRS, the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, Florida State Board of Administration, Maine Public Employees Retirement System, Maryland State Retirement and Pension System, TIAA’s Nuveen, OIP Investment Trust, Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund, Rockefeller Asset Management, San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System, State Street Global Advisors, and Wespath Investment Management. …”
State pension funds and companies which manage them and are beholden to (antigun) politicians.
“… [Christopher Ailman, chief investment officer at the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS)] insists that working to help reduce gun violence is part of their business. “This is part of the holistic picture of being an asset owner. It’s absolutely within our fiduciary duty to engage and try to bring about change,” said Ailman …”
No, your fiduciary duty is to provide maximum return to investors with minimum risk.
What exactly do they want?
At the heart of the framework are five main principles to guide institutional investors’ approach to affecting change within the firearms industry:
Principle 1: Manufacturers should support, advance, and integrate the development of technology designed to make civilian firearms safer, more secure, and easier to trace.
They mean things like microstamping and “smart guns” neither of which work.
Principle 2: Manufacturers should adopt and follow responsible business practices that establish and enforce responsible dealer standards, and promote training and education programs for owners designed around firearms safety.
NSSF and NRA already do this, but I guarantee that isn’t what these guys are looking for.
Principle 3: Civilian firearms distributors, dealers, and retailers should establish, promote, and follow best practices to ensure that no firearm is sold without a completed background check in order to prevent sales to persons prohibited from buying firearms or those too dangerous to possess firearms.
Universal background checks and gun owner databases.
Principle 4: Civilian firearms distributors, dealers, and retailers should educate and train their employees to better recognize and effectively monitor irregularities at the point of sale, to record all firearm sales, to audit firearms inventory on a regular basis, and to proactively assist law enforcement.
Hold dealers responsible for 3rd party misuse, strict liability.
Principle 5: Participants in the civilian firearms industry should work collaboratively, communicate, and engage with the signatories of these principles to design, adopt, and disclose measures and metrics demonstrating both best practices and their commitment to promoting these principles.
Basically show they have adopted the current gun control agenda.
“… Ailman emphasized that the group of investors isn’t looking to be an antagonist to the companies involved in the firearms supply chain, but to work with them to improve their product, similar to the way safety advocates in the 1980s successfully lobbied for nationwide seatbelt laws …”
Baloney. This is what nearly bankrupted Smith & Wesson and antigun advocates know it.
Essentially these largely unaccountable pension funds want to throw their fiduciary responsibility out the window and devalue their investments by forcing companies to engage in practices that hurt their business. There are some “socially conscience” firms which engage in this sort of behavior, but individuals can choose whether or not to put money in them. Government pension funds by and large do not give retirees that option. This is the perfect example of why public pensions should be converted over to private Roth IRA accounts which individuals manage themselves.
Nov 15, 2018 Politics
State of Politics reports that soon-to-be-former Majority Leader John Flanagan has called for a GOP leadership vote tomorrow.
I’ll keep it simple:
No to Flanagan and No to Cathy Young, in that order.
Nov 11, 2018 Politics
Senator John Flanagan has called for a Republican leadership vote this week.
It is my understanding that Senators Fred Akshar, Joe Griffo, Pat Gallivan and Jim Seward are all backing him, but if one or more folds, Flanagan is done.
Nov 7, 2018 Politics, State Legislation
This press release by Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie spells out (part) of next session’s gun control agenda:
“… Communities across our state and our country are slowly being torn apart by gun violence. It seems like we cannot go a week without hearing about a shooting at a school, a yoga studio or a place of worship. New York has always been a national model for sensible gun laws, and I look forward to working with our partners in the Senate to take up that mantle once again by requiring comprehensive background checks, banning bump stocks and keeping guns out of the hands of those proven to be a risk to others …”
What Governor Cuomo wants:
“… Cuomo said he also wants to make gun safety one of his legacies. He supports passage of the so-called Flag bill, which would allow a teacher or a family member to petition the court to have weapons confiscated from a person who may be dangerous or emotionally disturbed …”
Latest Entry