D’Amato speaks

For some reason Al D’Amato feels compelled to inject himself into the gun control debate.  From his op-ed at the LI Herald, “Calls for gun safety must not fall on deaf ears“:

“… Personally, I am a proponent of the Second Amendment, and throughout my career in the U.S. Senate I voted against bills that would have limited an individual’s right to own a gun … “

So how did you earn the D/D- ratings?

“…. However, there are always instances where certain gun-control measures are necessary. For example, I voted in favor of President Clinton’s 1994 measure that limited the manufacture of assault rifles …”

Thanks for the explanation.

“… Over time, we’ve learned that our gun-control system has failed us …”

So, clearly we must expand upon this failure rather than actually try dealing with the problems of violent criminals and cowardly politicans who hide behind them and/or exploit them for political gain?

“… One troubling trend is the increase in the sale of firearms at gun shows. Non-dealers, who can be anyone trying to sell guns they legally own, are allowed to rent a table at a show and sell them. They don’t have to follow federal guidelines and are permitted to sell firearms without checking backgrounds. It’s ludicrous!  …”

It’s also a fabricated non-issue Mayor Bloomberg is pushing.  Now we know where Al’s been getting his talking points.

“… Bloomberg … outlined a series of steps designed to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous individuals and those with a history of mental illness. “The law says that drug abusers can’t buy guns,” he said, “but even though Jared Loughner was rejected by the military for drug use and arrested on drug charges, he was able to pass a background check and buy a gun. It should be clear to everyone that the system is broken …””

He just admitted gun control doesn’t work. Why should we expand upon this failure?

“… Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy … announced plans to introduce federal legislation to ban high-capacity ammunition magazines. These magazines enable guns to carry more bullets, and give an attacker more time to fire before reloading …”

They also give citizens more time to act in self-defense against an aggressor or multiple aggressors.

Why is Al trying to inject himself into this issue?  It’s tempting to think that he’s just missing the media attention he got while in office, or that he’s gone senile.  However, he’s still something of a behind the scenes powerbroker for the RINO-wing of the NY GOP.  This bears watching to see if he tries to influence other Republicans.

Plan B sucks

Some advice from the NYPD on how to deal with active shooters courtesy of the NY Post:

“… “During an actual event, the NYPD recommends avoiding the shooter and evacuating immediately,” said Capt. Michael Riggio of the department’s Counterterrorism Bureau …”

Understandable.  Nobody really wants to get involved in a violent confrontation, especially if they don’t have all the facts about the situation.

“… Hiding behind a file cabinet is probably the best “Plan B” — and the Police Department proved it by shooting up different kinds of office furniture …”

Your tax dollars at work.

“…  “If no other option is available, and you are confronted with the gunman, we recommend trying to confront him with physical force as quickly and as aggressively as possible,” Riggio said.  “Consider using pens, staples, chair legs, anything you can get your hands on, as an improvised weapon.” …”

Improvised weapons?  If ever in a SHTF scenario which would you rather have immediately available:

  1. Quality office furniture
  2. A Swingline Collectors Edition 747 Rio Red Business Stapler
  3. A firearm

They can’t even bring themselves to mention guns as an option.  That’s pathetic.

Media dinosaurs

According to CBS News, “Poll: Americans Remain Split on Gun Control“:

“… Americans remain split on the issue of gun control, according to a new CBS News/New York Times poll.  The survey finds that Americans have moved slightly in favor of stricter laws in light of the incident … The poll finds that 46 percent of Americans think gun laws should be made stricter, while 38 percent want them to stay the same. Thirteen percent said they thought gun control laws should be made less strict … Even those who live in gun-owning households favor a ban on assault weapon … 54 percent of those Americans favor a ban on assault weapons … The survey also indicates that nearly two in three Americans favor a ban on high capacity clips …”

If this were true, then why does The Politico report, “Barack Obama’s conspicuous silence on guns“?

“Gun control is a perilous issue for President Barack Obama so the push for new restrictions following the shootings in Tucson, Ariz., puts the president in an especially tricky political predicament … he talks about the issue using muted, nonconfrontational tones engineered to avoid alienating gun-friendly voters, a huge proportion of the electorate that has steadily drifted away from Obama … White House officials have remained noncommittal about an effort by liberals in the House and Senate to restrict access to the kind of high-capacity ammunition magazines … When asked whether Obama will take up the issue of guns at next Tuesday’s State of the Union speech — White House officials said they know of no current plans to include the issue in his address …”

How can guns be a perilous political issue if more Americans have moved in favor of more gun control?

This just goes to show out out of touch media dinosaurs like CBS and the New York Times are with the average citizen.  Technology has broken their monopoly on disseminating news and information making it easy for the public to see through B.S. like this.  They can’t get away with lying and shilling for the antis like they did back in ’94 with the Clinton AWB.

You can ask, but …

Thoughts on banning guns.

Sarah Brady:

“… we’re asking President Barack Obama to help lead the way …”

Obama:

“You might have noticed that President Barack Obama has remained conspicuously silent over the issue of gun control … That’s because he realizes public opinion isn’t on his side …”

Convictions don’t count

White Plains Mayor Adam Bradley does not think he should be forced to give up his office just because he was convicted of spousal abuse.

Apparently Mayor Bloomberg does not think he should be removed as a partner in Mayors Against Illegal Guns because of those convictions either.

Still don’t have the votes

For all the whining, crying and hair pulling done by the antis over the past few days, they still don’t have the votes to move gun control through Congress and the big media jerks are dumbfounded over this.

Worse (for them) the story is starting to get old.  Other things like the House voting to scrap Obamacare will push it off the radar.  The antis and their media allies are losing this battle and they know it.

Schumer doesn’t have the votes

Chuck Schumer acknowledges there aren’t the votes for more gun control in Congress.

Great quote from Tom Coburn:

… “The problem with gun laws is they limit the ability to defend yourself, one. But number two is the people who are going to commit a crime or are going to do something crazy, aren’t going to pay attention to the laws in the first place.” …

Ramping up the PSH

New Yorker Against Gun Violence is turning the bullshitometer up to 11.  They have a video of a shooter firing a Glock 18 on their website and are implying it is the same as the Glock 19 used in the Arizona killings.

Legislative Report #2

Legislative Report #2 is now online.

Strangely, Sen. Adriano Espaillat (D-31) is sponsoring a shall issue bill S-1863.  He was not our friend when he was in the Assembly.  Something funny is going on …

Laura Ingraham interviews Pete King

Laura Ingraham interviews Pete King about his dumbass gun proposal.  It starts at 1:40.