Bloomberg wants to provide “spine” for politicians

 Mayor Mike on what he wants his super PAC to do:

“… The point of his super PAC, he said, was to provide “spine” for politicians under that sort of pressure, which is why, for instance, it is supporting the re-election of Representative Robert J. Dold, a Republican from Illinois. Mr. Dold got a “D” from the National Rifle Association for backing some gun restrictions.   “You’re not going to beat the N.R.A. overnight,” Mr. Bloomberg said. “As you get going, people start realizing that there’s a sane group of people out there that want them to do intelligent things, and that that’s where their support is going to come from.” …”

That’s nice, except for the fact that Independence USA PAC, like Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is funded almost entirely by one person: Bloomberg himself.  There’s no “group”, it’s just more astroturf wrapped around Bloomberg’s ego.

By and large, the antigun groups have given up on directly influencing elections through PACs and GOTV efforts.  Being astroturf they don’t have a constituency like NRA to raise money from or tell whom to vote for and appear to be shifting towards more “educational”/public relations type activities in an effort to still appear relevant.

Bishop v. Altschuler

A couple of polls are showing challenger Randy Altschuler slightly ahead of incumbent Congressman Tim Bishop in CD-1.  Bishop barely squeaked out a win in ’10 against Altschuler by 263 votes.  The district has a slight Republican enrollment advantage so hopefully this along with NRA’s endorsement of Altschuler and a general disgust with the Obama administration will be enough to push Bishop off the cliff this time around.

Bloomberg money dump

Da Mayor is putting his money where his mouth is:

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said he will spend an “eight-figure” sum on local, state and federal races across the country, “with a focus on issues including gun laws and education policy.” …

Bloomberg not satisfied

Despite Obama’s public support for a new AWB, Mayor Mike isn’t satisfied:

“… “I think what we did get was a perfect example of obfuscation and very little honesty,” Bloomberg said.  “If you think about it, the president, as I remember, said he wants more conversation.  Well, we’ve been saying this for quite a while now.  We don’t need more talk.  We need some leadership.  Governor Romney said he brought both sides of the debate together.  Well, why isn’t he trying to do that right now? … Then they had all this gibberish talking about education, that education is the solution to stop the killing.  My recollection is that if the Aurora theater shooter, he was a PhD candidate, OK?  And Virginia Tech, the massacre was committed by a student at a first class university … The solution is to prevent all people who shouldn’t have guns from getting them.” …”

The antis got an awful lot out of Obama last night and it is going to cost him politically.  They should be happy with that.

Obama calls for gun ban

I believe President Obama committed political suicide during last night’s debate where he called for reinstating an AWB:

“… what I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally.  Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced …”

He’s been real careful to avoid gun control over the last four years.  Why he decided to say this now I don’t know.  My only guess is with polls now showing Mitt Romney at 50% and his ’08 supporters abandoning him, he’s trying to shore up a disintegrating base.

Solid as Jello

Via FoxNews, “Gun rights groups now aligning solidly behind Romney“:

“Gun-rights groups perceive President Barack Obama as a threat to unfettered access to firearms.  They once had qualms about Mitt Romney, too.  But times and circumstances have changed for Romney, the GOP presidential nominee now in tune with the National Rifle Association and similar organizations, whose members are motivated voters …”

What do they mean “once had”?  Gunnies still do have reservations about Romney, lots of them.  He’s not “in tune” with NRA either.  NRA appears to have gotten some assurances from Romney on SCOTUS nominees and H.R. 822 which, along with not making Romney into the second coming of Charlton Heston, have quieted people down somewhat.

While the membership can be motivated to vote, I have not heard a single person say they’re excited about voting for Romney because of his latest positions on gun rights.  Fortunately, with the economy such an overriding issue this election, the gun issue isn’t high up on peoples list of concerns right now.

Voting guide

The general election voting guide is now online with ratings for Assembly and Senate, plus some judicial endorsements..

Ryan cuts interview short

Paul Ryan interview on ABC affiliate WJRT. According to the Daily News, the reporter knew he was over time when he started asking questions about gun control and taxes.

NRA ad

Here’s an NRA ad they’re running in Florida, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin.  I’m not impressed with it.