Gun control advocates hate 1A as much as 2A

I can see this bill being used against 2A advocates, A-9156/S-7568.

When reviewing bills, ignore the justification statement as it is often straight up B.S. You have to read the bill text.

In this case we have:

§ 18-501. Prohibited activities. No person, by conduct either unlawful in itself or unreasonable under all the circumstances, shall knowingly or recklessly create, maintain or contribute to a condition in New York state that endangers the safety or health of the public through the promotion of content, including through the use of algorithms or other 18 automated systems that prioritize content by a method other than solely by time and date such content was created, the person knows or reasonably should know: 1. advocates for the use of force, is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and is likely to incite or produce such action; 2. advocates for self-harm, is directed to inciting or producing imminent self-harm, and is likely to incite or produce such action; or 3. includes a false statement of fact or fraudulent medical theory that is likely to endanger the safety or health of the public.

Antis could declare the statement Guns Save Lives to be false information and target the web host. Sure, it may ultimately fail in court but the purpose to chill dissent from the “progressive” leftist ideology. It is important to note that gun control advocates have been trying to paint “gun violence” as a public health crisis for years as well.