Some more paperwork has been filed by our side in response to the State’s response to the initial filing:
- Memo Of Law
- Notice of Cross Motion
- Plaintiffs Counter Statement of Undisputed Material Facts
- Plaintiffs Response the the State Defendants Statement of Undisputed Material Facts
Both sides are next due in court on September 12.
Can someone give me a laymans breakdown of what all this is please?
Counter filing of facts is very well done.
So is this good or bad ? I’m not to good with legal terms .
What is this specific lawsuit about and on what grounds.
Thx for the update and your hard work
Is there an abbreviated version that can outline the outlook for us? I understand we are back in court on 9/12 but how is our case shaping up overall?
So, it’s in the hands of the judge noW!
So is this good or bad? Confidence level?
Best wishes fighting this arbitrary ridiculous act.
Tyler, it looks good for our side but until a few weeks rolls in, your at the edge of the seat till then!
Excellent! excellent! Report! This should stop any further arguments! I like hearing facts Rather then babbling nonsense!! Awesome job you guys!!!
THANK YOU!!! All my concerns are addressed +! Did word searches, but I want to slowly read thru in detail during morning coffee. Will be an education!
Correction – many morning coffees.
For some reason everything NYSR&PA posts says [Comment imported from blog].
Shithammer that tyrant! Bring all the forces of the legal system to bear on that thug! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO! IMPEACH CUOMO!
Ok, let me start by saying I am NOT a legal scholar . . . . But in my opinion these documents outline irrefutable arguments that EVEN an anti 2A judiciary would find difficult to strike down. Unfortunately for us all there are plenty of Anti 2A judges to choose from to attempt it. My guess is they will find a way to pass the buck to someone else. . . Until AFTER the next election cycle.
Tom Gorey
http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=qD3Eavl-Cow&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DqD3Eavl-Cow%26feature%3Dshare
It’s just like I’ve said all along, the state thought they saw a hole in the Heller case based on one little line in part of the decision. Now, NYS and a host of others are trying to slither through that hole with all kinds of new restrictions. It’s like kids throwing cow pies against the wall and seeing if one of them will stick. The responses you guys have submitted in court look excellent, great job! But, to be honest, I’ll breath a whole lot easier when the District court sides with us.
This guy is worth every penny we are paying. Awsome!