State response to request for injunction

The State has responded to our request for an injunction:

“… Assistant Attorney General Benjamin Ahlstrom wrote in court papers that the claims have no merit.  He noted the motion was filed late Monday, three months after the law passed, undercutting any argument of “perceived imminent harm.”  Ahlstrom asked for 60 days to respond to the injunction request, instead of an expedited schedule he said would deprive government lawyers of adequate time to submit papers “in defense of this landmark statute.”  “The one-sided presentation proposed by plaintiffs is no orderly way to litigate important constitutional issues or to resolve a motion that seeks to enjoin duly enacted state legislation” Ahlstrom wrote …”

Why would they need 60 days to respond when they could not bother to wait just three days for the bills to age before pushing it through the legislature?  If the Governor can use a message of necessity why can’t we?

One thought on “State response to request for injunction

  1. So this libtard does not understand that the perceived imminent harm is at the point that the law is in force, and not the point that it was passed. The law went into force on Monday, so NRA / NYSRPA timing was perfect. DOES ANYBODY UNDERSTAND THIS? Its not vector calc applied to Maxwells equations.

Comments are closed.