“Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg commissioned a poll last month to see how he would fare as a third-party candidate against Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, the respective Democratic and Republican presidential front-runners, a source close to the former mayor told CNN Saturday night. The source said Bloomberg, a billionaire media executive, commissioned the poll after watching the meteoric rise of political newcomer Trump over the past six months …”
I’m having a hard time deciding which one is more offensive: Bloomberg, Clinton or Trump. Image a race between them. Why not just wait for the Fourth Horseman to arrive and get it all over with?
“… But the source did not discuss the poll’s findings …”
I’m guessing it wasn’t favorable. What would he bring to the table that these two already haven’t?
I think the democrats are starting to understand that Hillary may not win in a general election. This is also true and it seems to be going around in the media that with 60 days or so, she may get indicted. This also rings true to the belief that she may not be as healthy as others have said to be president. I think it may be Bernie or bust!
Your thoughts Jacob?
Yes, but there is no way they’d go with Bernie instead.
Mikey have a tough time playing to voters outside NYC. Can’t see the guy eating BBQ in Texas or Alabama, or at a Montana rodeo….asking for votes.
Bernie doing as well is indication how dissatisfied dems are with HRC.
“What would he bring to the table that these two already haven’t?”
Nothing. Hillary already has Stalinism covered, and Bloomie doesn’t support freedom as Trump does.
I suppose that Bloomberg was looking for a higher level of support than Trump with his commissioned poll. I suspect that he got considerably less than he paid for. I can see the look on his face as a result of that, and I like it. 🙂