S-260A, Relates to Extreme Risk Protection Orders; defines “exception”, has been amended in Judiciary.
Companion A-3384 not in sync.
All about guns, legislation and politics in New York
S-260A, Relates to Extreme Risk Protection Orders; defines “exception”, has been amended in Judiciary.
Companion A-3384 not in sync.
Gun owners, being only ordinary people, foolishly imagine that “extreme risk” orders mean that there is actually an extreme risk, which they, foolishly, imagine that they are not, because they simply own a gun because their guns are no threat to anyone.
No, doesn’t work that way, and by evil design. The mere fact that a gun, any gun, is involved, now legally means that there is “extreme risk”. And that by law. Why is that? Why is it that mere passive exercise of the RKBA is so falsely construed to be an “extreme risk”? Let me put it this way, there are an awful lot of grinning, NYS/NYC, mostly downstate, PoCs behind that. They know exactly who will be most affected by it, and they smile when they think about the damage that they will inflict on white men, particularly upstate, white men. Yes, it’s straight up anti-white, racism, but NYS, AG Letitia James merely smiles from ear to ear in response. Is New York State straight up racist? Can you do the math? This is Chernobyl. Watch the movie. Denial, after denial, after denial, until denial is impossible, and the facts on the ground must be acknowledged. That is where we are going, with all of this.