{"id":493,"date":"2009-12-15T17:55:26","date_gmt":"2009-12-15T22:55:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gunpoliticsny.com\/?p=493"},"modified":"2009-12-15T17:55:26","modified_gmt":"2009-12-15T22:55:26","slug":"losing-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.gunpoliticsny.com\/?p=493","title":{"rendered":"Losing strategy"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Protection in Lawful Commerce in Arms Act<\/a> is doing it’s thing according to this press release<\/a> from the NSSF<\/a>:<\/p>\n

“The U.S. Supreme Court<\/a> on Monday handed Beretta U.S.A.<\/a> and the firearms industry another victory by rejecting the Brady Center’s<\/a> appeal of Adames v. Beretta U.S.A. Corporation<\/a><\/em> challenging the constitutionality of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) … This is now the third time this year the Supreme Court has denied a challenge to the PLCAA backed by the Brady Center. In March 2009, the Brady Center was also involved in the appeals of Lawson v. Beretta<\/a><\/em> and City of New York v. Beretta<\/a><\/em>, both of which the Supreme Court refused to hear …”<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This, of course, has not stopped NYAGV<\/a> from pushing gun dealer liability legislation in Albany, A-1093<\/a>\/S-1715<\/a>.<\/p>\n