There will be a question on the November ballot asking whether or not the state should hold a constitutional convention.\u00a0 If approved there would be future votes on choosing delegates then actual changes to the constitution.<\/p>\n
Looking at it from strictly a 2A<\/a> perspective, I don’t believe there is much to get out of a Con Con:<\/p>\n With 2A off the table, the benefits of a Con Con to gun owners would be indirect.\u00a0 I can see these items proposed and passed:<\/p>\n These would make elections much more competitive thereby giving gun owners more clout and that is what we sorely need in Albany.<\/p>\n Who is opposing the Con Con?\u00a0 The bulk of the money is coming from unions and lawyers<\/a>.\u00a0 They’re not antigun per se, but are largely responsible for the culture of cronyism and corruption.\u00a0 If their power is diminished that is a good thing.<\/p>\n Vote Yes<\/strong> on the Con Con.<\/p>\n\n
\n