{"id":14961,"date":"2017-08-25T10:36:53","date_gmt":"2017-08-25T14:36:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gunpoliticsny.com\/?p=14961"},"modified":"2017-08-25T10:36:53","modified_gmt":"2017-08-25T14:36:53","slug":"have-another-go","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.gunpoliticsny.com\/?p=14961","title":{"rendered":"Have another go"},"content":{"rendered":"

Another right-to-carry case is making it’s way towards SCOTUS<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The District of Columbia<\/span><\/a> has filed an appeal with the U.S. District Court of Appeals<\/a> requesting an en banc<\/i><\/a> hearing in a case of Wrenn v. District of Columbia<\/i><\/a> which struck down the “special need”<\/a> requirement for obtaining a CCW.<\/p>\n

Regardless of the District Court’s decision,\u00a0 it is reasonable to assume one side or the other will petition SCOTUS.\u00a0 If we follow the timeline, and the rumors of Justice Kennedy’s retirement<\/a> are true, by the time it gets there the makeup of the court will have changed +1 pro-gun since Peruta vs. California<\/em><\/a> was declined.<\/p>\n