{"id":11036,"date":"2014-12-15T14:28:50","date_gmt":"2014-12-15T19:28:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gunpoliticsny.com\/?p=11036"},"modified":"2014-12-15T14:28:50","modified_gmt":"2014-12-15T19:28:50","slug":"giving-lawyers-a-bad-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.gunpoliticsny.com\/?p=11036","title":{"rendered":"Giving lawyers a bad name"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bottom-feeding lawyers are coming out of the woodwork, “Families Of Newtown Shooting Victims Sue Rifle Manufacturer<\/a>“:<\/p>\n

“The families of nine of the 26 people killed and a teacher wounded two years ago at the Sandy Hook Elementary School filed a lawsuit Monday against the manufacturer, distributor and seller of the rifle used in the shooting. …”<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act<\/a> should put a stop to this.<\/p>\n

\u201c… The negligence and wrongful death lawsuit, filed in Bridgeport Superior Court, asserts that the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle should not have been made publicly available because it was designed for military use and is unsuited for hunting or home defense. The AR-15 was specifically engineered for the United States military to meet the needs of changing warfare,\u201d attorney Josh Koskoff<\/a> said in a release. \u201cIn fact, one of the Army\u2019s specifications for the AR-15 was that it has the capability to penetrate a steel helmet.\u201d …”<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Anyone can easily Google<\/a> the history of the AR-15 and disprove this bullshit statement.<\/p>\n

I would like to know who is financing this legal action.\u00a0 It has to be Bloomberg<\/a> or some antigun foundation, either directly or through a front like the Bradys<\/a>.<\/p>\n